While
working as a peer tutor in both community college and a four-year school, I
frequently had to come to terms with my identity as, well, a confused American.
One of my tutees—I’ll call her Kate for the purpose of privacy—sat across from me in the computer lab, tapping her pen against her textbook.
“I am trying to learn more
about American identities,” Kate said, speaking slowly so that I could
understand her through her Japanese accent. “Since I am taking it as class, I
want to know more.”
“I can try. What do you
want to know?”
“What is your American
identity?”
I faltered. “My identity?”
“Yes. What is it like to be
an American, to have that identity?”
“Well,” I paused for
deliberation. “There’s not really one answer. I mean, how I am isn’t how
everyone else is.”
She
looked at me in confusion, and I shifted nervously in my chair. Her questioning
glance begged for an explanation, but it was one I was unwilling to give—although
at the time I didn’t know why.
She looked
at me with that I-don’t-get-it face as I twisted my pencil through my fingers,
trying to find something to say. Meanwhile, she decided to take a different
approach.
“In America, are certain
birthdays bigger than others?”
I resisted the temptation
to heave a sigh of relief. An easy question. “Sixteenth birthday parties are
important to some people. I guess because you can start driving then. Also,
sometimes eighteen, because you can vote then, or twenty-one because you’re at the
legal age to drink alcohol.”
“Drinking is important
here, isn’t it?”
“Um,” the question was one
I wanted to avoid. “It is to some people. I don’t drink at all, but most people
I know do. It is kind of important to a lot of Americans, but especially in
college I think. I’m pretty sure people think I’m really weird for not
drinking.” I laughed as I said the last sentence, hoping to appear as if I
didn’t care about being weird.
Kate scrawled some notes in
her composition book. “Do Americans like people from other countries?” I must
have looked uncomfortable because she laughed and added, “In general. Not just
me.”
I laughed too, but I still felt uncomfortable.
Most of the time, my classmates avoided these kinds of discussions. “Of
course,” I said. Then I stopped. “Well, people at Fredonia do I think. We care
a whole lot about welcoming people from other cultures. But, to be honest, I
don’t think it’s like that everywhere in America. In my hometown, people don’t
talk about ethnicity much, but I’ve heard stories about places where that’s not
the case. I mean, I like to know about other cultures for sure. I love to know
people from various parts of the world, but I guess not everyone does.”
Her pen stopped moving. “What about girls who
are fat? Are they accepted here?”
I shifted in my chair,
considering her question. “No,” I said after a moment, “Not really. The posters
in stores are all of very skinny girls, and pretty much all of our
advertisements tell us we should lose weight.”
“But, I see fat girls on
campus with boyfriends.”
“Yes,”
I said, “That’s true. Do larger girls in your country not have boyfriends?”
“No, they don’t,” she
said, “not usually.”
I was startled. My culture was suddenly
looking very different.
“That’s another thing,” Kate continued, “I see girls in bikinis lying
right in the middle of campus. Is that normal for Americans? They seem so free.
In my country, no one would do that.”
I grimaced inwardly. “Again,” I said,
“I would never do that. And, people at my community college would never have
done that. They wear bikinis at the
beach, not at school. It’s confusing because I’m not really used to Fredonia
either. It’s so hard to say that certain actions are American. We’re all so
different.”
Kate bit her lip in contemplation, and
I shifted nervously in my chair. She was very good at English, so I knew her
confusion had nothing to do with the language barrier.
“Americans are so free,” she said
again. “They do things I never thought were okay before.” The way she said the
word “free” made me wonder if she valued this freedom.
“Yeah, we
are free. We value freedom very much in a lot of ways. I don’t agree with the
things that some people choose to do, just as they don’t all agree with the
things I choose to do, but in America we’re free to do lots of different
things.”
I
don’t know how much Kate considered this conversation after our session was
over, but I thought about it all the way home, the whole evening, and well into
the next day. And, ever since that point, her questions have haunted me.
What
exactly is an American? And what is
my American identity? Why was I so reluctant to explain my own differences?
As I
considered these questions, I discovered that the root of my reluctance was
found at the sole reason for my differences: my status as a Protestant
Christian.
Stop
there.
For the
remainder of my narrative, please expel the following images, and all similar images, from your mind
whenever I refer to Protestant Christianity.
“Realist”
or even “Realistic” art cannot properly convey a sense of who Jesus was. Think
of it this way. If a painter had never seen someone she was about to paint, how
could she accurately depict that person? If she had a good verbal or written
description, she might be able to recreate a fairly accurate image, but, if not, she must simply
use her imagination.
In the case of paintings of Jesus, the artists have no descriptions of his physiognomy. In fact, The Bible says that Jesus just looked like an ordinary man. In this “ordinariness” there might have been space for artistic creativity, but the longstanding traditions of the church have, at least to some degree, suppressed the imaginative nature of these paintings. Jesus looks essentially the same in many of the paintings, creating a false sense of knowledge about what he looked like, and, even worse, about who he was.
Jesus,
first of all, was not white. Second, he didn’t always have a glowing halo
around his head. Third, I have no concrete evidence for this, but I’m sure he
didn’t always look off into the distance like some kind of cold, inhuman being.
He was a real person.
With
that said, understand that I have never loved church. The cold stained-glass
murals, the empty eyes of an artist’s rendition of a white, melancholy savior,
even the dull purple of the new carpet—nothing about church buildings register
in my mind as majestic or noteworthy.
I attended
a small, Protestant church regularly as a child, following the example of my
family. I viewed this attendance, even at a very young age, as a necessary part
of the proper working of my world—although I found sitting still through an
entire sermon a tedious task even in my teen-age years.
This
oblivious attendance, I have often been told, is what forms the aspect of my
identity called my religion. I, however, reject this idea—along with another
frequently expressed opinion that family pressure formed my so-called religious
views. My family believes in unconditional love. I can openly reject their
views on any subject and see no difference in their actions towards me.
It is my
firm conviction, therefore, that the part of my identity others call religion
developed from a realization unsolicited by either my family or the numerous churches
to which I have belonged.
As a young
child, I remember having an epiphany as I rode my bike in circles at the end of
our driveway. As I rode over the worn-out pavement, I reflected on the circles
of my life—home, church, my homeschool cooperative group, and extended family
gatherings. As I thought about my role
in these circles, I came to the realization that I saw the world as centered on
myself. I did not consider myself a bad
person; after all, I obeyed my parents for the most part and tried my best to
be kind to my friends. Yet, I was haunted by a sense of wrong motivation. Why
did I obey my parents? Because if I did not, I would be in trouble. Why was I good to my friends? Because it made
me feel good inside. I had a feeling
that I was not as nice of a person as I liked to think.
During my
childhood, I also spent an extraordinary amount of time outside the confines of
buildings and among nature. Since my education took place at home, in a fairly
safe rural neighborhood, my parents let me read, play, and exercise outdoors as
frequently as I wanted to—provided, of course, that I finished my school work
on time. And, I wanted to be outdoors frequently.
I believe
that it was there—in those moments when I sat nestled at the base of a tree,
staring up at the network of branches above, or on a boulder in the creek as
minnows swam below—that I developed the part of myself that I most value—that
is: the part that was transformed by the realization that there is so much more
to life than just living for my own happiness.
As a
teen-ager, I began a slow, but continuous, journey to learn more about the man
introduced to me as the Messiah—the one whose cold, iconic images now render
him cliché and distant in so many minds. I wanted to see who he really was, beyond
the dusty paintings and the exclusive pillars of tradition. I read the Bible,
and I was amazed to find the message of love and forgiveness he brought to the
world. I delved into the Old Testament and saw that God is more complex and
powerful than I had ever thought before. And, after all—as C.S. Lewis taught
me—should I not have known that God would be so far beyond us from my own
experiences with the complexity of life and nature?
It
was during this time, that I began to realize that following Jesus was not
about the church building at all. Instead, it had to do with a remarkable
quality among the people who followed him.
My childhood
eyes were always watching the people in my church—from the young couple with
the baby that cried every Sunday to the elderly woman who fell asleep in the
middle of every sermon. I watched them closely to see what, exactly, brought
them all here into this sub-par, moldy building. This is what I saw.
I saw a
woman in my church forgive her husband for cheating on her, even before he came
back to her; I watched their marriage rebuild. I saw the people from my church
come visit me in the hospital when I had appendicitis. I saw the church members
pray together, openly admitting their own shortcomings. I saw my youth pastor
work in a homeless shelter, called the Bowery Mission, tirelessly, giving his time and money to help those
with nothing. As a teen-ager, I saw my
close friends choose sexual abstinence until marriage, even when it was hard,
because they cared so much about following what he taught. I saw racial and
economic boundaries disappear between friends. And, I watched as my pastor in
college took away the part of the service dedicated to the morning offering in
an effort to show his congregation that he wanted to help them, not to take
their money.
After
all that I had seen of the power of Jesus’ name, why did I not wish to talk
about my differences? Why was I afraid to speak up?
As
Americans, one of our main points of weakness is our prejudice. We create false
boundary lines between groups of people in more ways than I can describe. From
the division of social groups in high schools to the glass ceiling in the
workplace, we divide ourselves in terms of perceived race, educational level,
type of education, religion, appearance, eating habits, salary, living
conditions, clothing choice, level of fitness, height, gender, overall social
status, and more. The fact that America contains such diversity, such
differences, is wonderful. Yet, all too often, we draw these lines not as
points of interest but as points of making ourselves look better, forgetting that we all share the common identity of humanity, in search of fostering an
“other.” We forget, in the very process of trying to encourage “respect,” that
we are not showing proper respect to certain groups of people.
American
history has shown, time and time again, that we, as Americans, are biased,
racist, and prejudiced towards outside influences. We do not want immigration
to wipe out our identities. We want to remain distinctly apple-pie American at
all costs.
How,
you might ask, does this relate to my own reluctance to convey my religious
beliefs?
First,
Protestant Christianity has been guilty of shameful acts of prejudice over the
course of history. There is no denying that people have committed atrocious,
hateful crimes in the name of the one who told us to “love your neighbor as
yourself” and to “forgive seventy times seven.” Many people, now, see Jesus as
the cold figurehead of an ideological movement intended to make everyone who is
not a Christian the evil “other,” and, in the light of certain historical
movements, they are right to be skeptical of the ideology that the church has
formed around the original life and words of Jesus.
However,
this is not to say that Christianity has only had negative impacts
historically. The Quakers were among the first to consider the moral dilemmas
surrounding slavery, and many branches of Christianity supported the civil
rights movement. Indeed, historically black churches greatly supported the
civil rights movement, providing places for meetings and encouraging the
congregations to support protests. For example, Martin Luther King’s famous “I
have a Dream Speech” was widely supported by the black Christian church. Currently,
Christianity also serves as a kind of transnational identity, as an increasing number of
individuals from other countries, such as Korea, embrace the religion. So,
while Christianity has a negative history, it also has a positive history of
supporting oppressed groups and of welcoming social change.
Also,
in the thread of history that mainstream culture has all but forgotten, in the
quiet lives of Christians who take Jesus’ words and actions seriously, lives another
branch of so-called “religion." True
Christianity is about embracing differences, about unconditional forgiveness,
about always having a chance to start over again, and about ridding oneself of
hatred. The kind of Christianity that truly seeks to understand Jesus’ mission
centers on, not social pressure conversions, but on living one’s life with the
intent of showing unconditional love, not in word but in action.
In
the wave of secular humanism present in educated societies today, Christianity
has come to mean, for some, a way to inhibit progress, a crutch for the weak,
or a downright malicious form of squelching free-thinking.
That
is precisely why it is so difficult to voice my American identity, to explain
my differences. I have a voice, but it is a voice that, like so many others
today, is often pressured into silence. Caught between wanting to share our
views and the fear of being discriminated against or of offending someone, we
are, often, silent when we should be sharing our ideas.
while in my undergraduate studies, I found myself increasingly alone.
“How
old are you?” The words came from a professor of religious studies, whose hour-
long interview with me had just come to a close. I had agreed to participate in
a “religious study” since my co-worker was having difficulty finding any
“fundamentalist” Christians.
“Twenty,”
I answered.
“Twenty.
You are too young to be so sure about what you believe. I am a doctorate of
religion. I’ve spent much of my life studying different religions. You cannot
be so certain.”
I
said nothing. What was there to say?
He
continued. “Do you know your Bible?”
I
nodded.
“The
respect of the Lord is…?”
“The
fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom?” I asked, uncertain if that was
the verse he was looking for.
“I
like ‘respect’ better. You have to show people respect, and you have to listen
with an open mind. Ever since you came into my office you’ve been defensive and
too sure of yourself. How old is Christianity? 2,000 years, right?”
I
was starting to wish I had left the moment he turned the recorder off. After
the interview, I had refused payment, feeling that it wouldn’t be right of me
to take money for simply talking about my beliefs. And, in that moment, his
attitude towards me changed completely, like the flipping of a switch.
He
was waiting for an answer.
“Well,”
I said, “It is...But, it’s older if you consider The Old Testament order as
part of Christianity.”
“Do
you know how old Hinduism is?"
"No." I had a pretty good guess, but I didn't want the conversation to escalate into any further perceived disrespect on my part.
"5,000 years, " he said."You are too young to be sure of yourself. You need to learn respect."
As someone who hadn't been accused of disrespect since junior high school, I was starting to feel ovwerhelmed. He would have continued, I think, but I broke down in tears.
I
had answers for him. I had reasons why I believed and why Christianity’s state
as a seemingly younger religion didn’t negate its truth. But, how could I
explain them without engaging in an activity he saw as disrespectful?
“If
you will not consider other views,” he said, “then you are dead to me.”
I
was late to class because of the interview, and my professor asked afterwards
if I was all right. She was very kind, and I wanted to tell her what had
happened. But, I was too afraid. She didn’t know me well enough to vouch for my
character, other than the fact that I came to class and participated. I told her I was
just having a bad day.
I
thought about telling a classmate about the interview, but I decided against
that as well. My classmates were all very kind, and I loved hearing their
different perspectives on the world. Listening to them helped me learn about
the incredible diversity of thought and ideas that can exist inside of even
just one classroom. Yet, I didn’t expect them to understand my own views. As I
listened to their ideas, I came to realize that the life I lived was completely
different from my classmates. And, maybe they, too, would think I was
disrespectful and too sure of myself.
So
I lapsed into a kind of pressured silence about my views.
At
the same time as I felt this pressure towards silence about my religion, I also
felt a pressure of guilt over the color of my skin.
Generations
of white Americans have oppressed Native Americans, African Americans, and Asian Americans. The books that I read
constantly point to the guilt of my ancestors, and, since my ancestors have
been in America for a very long time (I have Daughters of the American
Revolution status on both sides of my family tree), I cannot escape this guilt
by placing my past in a different country. I am as white as I can be. As such,
must I uphold the guilt of my ancestors?
I
cannot fully answer that question. However, I have come to learn that upholding
guilt from the past should not consume us in the present. Instead, it should
motivate us to make changes, to look towards the future with the idea in mind
that we can make a positive difference.
During college, for the first time,
I became sharply aware of my race. In my hometown, and even at my community
college, diversity was an accepted part of life. Black, White, Hispanic, and
Asian people lived and worked side by side. We hardly ever even talked about
the differences in our skin. If we were from separate countries, we talked
about it as a point of curiosity—always with the understanding that we shared
the common identity of being human.
At
Fredonia, however, among a new group of friends, I started to perceive racial
boundaries.
“You are
racist because you are white,” one of my best friends informed me, “You can’t
help it.” This remark, coming unexpectedly, almost randomly, from my friend,
haunted me for months afterwards. Was I racist just by existing, regardless of what I did to fight against racism?
As I
learned more in history class about the horrific racial oppression in which my
ancestors took part, I found myself becoming more and more ashamed of my own
race. I wished desperately that I could trace my ancestry anywhere but here.
As I met
my husband, however, whose ancestry is in the Philippines, I began to come to
terms with my race as well. Some people, like my husband, do accept me in spite
of the mistakes so many of my ancestors made. I can never undo the wrong that
they did, but I can make sure that my life is devoted to welcoming people who
are different, to seeking their best.
Besides, it is not what people think of me that matters the
most—believing that it is has been one of my most frequent downfalls. Instead,
what matters is how I view the world and how well I put other’s needs before my
own.
Just
as I wish for more acceptance of my own identity as a Protestant Christian, so
my friends wish for acceptance of their identities.
Ultimately,
I do believe our goal as Americans is to respect one another, to learn about
our differences, and to become individuals who live up to the statement that
“all men are created equal.” Sometimes respect means listening to someone whose
opinion you may not want to hear, sometimes respect means staying quiet about a
disagreement, and sometimes it means giving up the notion of being right about
an issue. But, in the end, respect should never mean that an individual fears
to voice his or her beliefs, no matter how young he or she may be.
I have a voice now about my own identity as a Protestant, Christian American who believes in the power of loving others unconditionally.
It is time for us, as Americans, to allow for
true respect to govern our actions, the kind of respect that allows for us to
stand on truth, but to also be prepared to let others voice their ideas. There
is nothing wrong with knowing where you stand and voicing that truth, as long
as you are willing to listen to other people.
That
is my voice. Now, let me hear yours.
No comments:
Post a Comment